How to Evaluate a Retrieval-Augmented Generation System
A RAG assistant can fail at retrieval, at reasoning or at answering. Evaluating each stage separately is the fastest way to improve quality.
Insight topic
Retrieval, grounding, evaluation and deployment of generative AI and language models. Articles in this topic are written for leaders and practitioners who need practical, evidence-based guidance.
2 articles in Generative AI
A RAG assistant can fail at retrieval, at reasoning or at answering. Evaluating each stage separately is the fastest way to improve quality.
Uptime dashboards will not tell you that answers have quietly become worse. A monitoring plan for quality, grounding, safety, cost and user behaviour.
Topic guide
Generative AI and large language models draft, summarise, explain and transform content. The articles in this topic address the engineering behind dependable generative AI: grounding in approved knowledge, evaluation, security and cost control.
FAQ
Ground answers in retrieved, approved sources, require citations, allow the system to decline when evidence is missing and evaluate quality continuously on real questions.
Retrieval-augmented generation, where relevant documents are retrieved and supplied to a language model that writes an answer based on them.
Usually not first. Retrieval and good prompting meet most needs. Fine-tuning helps for specialised formats, tone or narrow tasks where evaluation shows a benefit.
Related
Where these ideas are put into practice.
Next step
If you are working through a related challenge, we would be glad to talk it through.
Or write to care@aarhit.com